Title IX Grievance Policy

The College of Saint Rose

Policy Number: 06.17

Responsible Office: Title IX and Human Resources

Origination Date: August 14, 2020

Revision Date: October 10, 2023

Policy and Purpose

Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 prohibits any person in the United States from being discriminated against on the basis of sex in seeking access to any educational program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The U.S. Department of Education, which enforces Title IX, has long defined the meaning of Title IX’s prohibition on sex discrimination broadly to include various forms of sexual harassment and sexual violence that interfere with a student’s ability to equally access our educational programs and opportunities.

On May 19, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education issued a Final Rule under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 that:

Defines the meaning of “sexual harassment” (including forms of sex-based violence)
Addresses how this institution must respond to reports of misconduct falling within that definition of sexual harassment, and
Mandates a grievance process that this institution must follow to comply with the law in these specific covered cases before issuing a disciplinary sanction against a person accused of sexual harassment.

See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026 (May 19, 2020). The full text of the Final Rule and its extensive Preamble are available here: http://bit.ly/TitleIXReg

Based on the Final Rule, The College of Saint Rose (the College) will implement the following Title IX Grievance Policy, effective August 14, 2020.

In recent years, “Title IX” cases have become a short-hand for any campus disciplinary process involving sex discrimination, including those arising from sexual harassment and sexual assault. But under the Final Rule, the College must narrow both the geographic scope of its authority to act under Title IX and the types of “sexual harassment” that it must subject to its Title IX investigation and adjudication process. Only incidents falling within the Final Rule’s definition of sexual harassment will be investigated and, if appropriate, brought to a live hearing through the Title IX Grievance Policy defined below.

The College of Saint Rose remains committed to addressing any violations of its policies, even those not meeting the narrow standards defined under the Title IX Final Rule. To the extent that alleged misconduct falls outside of the Title IX Grievance Policy, or misconduct falling outside the Title IX Grievance Policy is discovered in the course of investigating covered Title IX misconduct, the institution retains authority to investigate and adjudicate the allegations under the any College policies and procedures, including, but not limited to, the following:

The College is responsible for determining which policies apply to complaints.

The elements established in the Title IX Grievance Policy under the Final Rule have no effect and are not transferable to any other policy of the College for any violation of the Sexual Misconduct Policy or the Community Standards, employment policies, or any civil rights violation except as narrowly defined in this Policy. This Policy does not set a precedent for other policies or processes of the College and may not be cited for or against any right or aspect of any other policy or process.

Our existing Title IX office and reporting structure remains in place. What has changed is the way our Title IX office will handle different types of reports arising from sexual misconduct, as detailed in full throughout Section 2.

The Sexual Misconduct Policy was adopted in order to satisfy the College’s obligations under New York State Education Law Article 129-B. The information provided in Sections III-V, VI, and X-XI of the Sexual Misconduct Policy apply to all student victims of Sexual Assault, Nonconsensual Sexual Activity, Relationship Violence, and Stalking (as defined in the Sexual Misconduct Policy), including victims whose Formal Complaints are investigated under this Policy. However, Sections II, VI, VIII, and IX of the Sexual Misconduct Policy do not apply to students whose cases are handled under the Title IX Grievance Policy. Questions regarding the interplay between these policies should be directed to the Title IX Coordinator.

II.Definitions:

A. Covered Sexual Harassment

For the purposes of this Title IX Grievance Policy, “covered sexual harassment” includes any conduct on the basis of sex that satisfies one or more of the following:

An employee conditioning educational benefits on participation in unwelcome sexual conduct (i.e., quid pro quo);
Unwelcome conduct that a reasonable person would determine is so severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the educational institution’s education program or activity;
Sexual assault (as defined in the Clery Act), which includes any sexual act directed against another person, without the consent of the victim including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent;
- Rape: The penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.
- Fondling: The touching of the private body parts of another person for the purpose of sexual gratification, without consent of the victim, including instances where the victim is incapable of giving consent because of their age or because of their temporary or permanent mental incapacity.
- Incest: Sexual intercourse between persons who are related to each other within the degrees wherein marriage is prohibited by law.
- Statutory Rape: Sexual intercourse with a person who is under the statutory age of consent.
Dating violence (as defined in the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) amendments to the Clery Act), which includes any violence committed by a person: (A) who is or has been in a social relationship of a romantic or intimate nature with the victim; and (B) where the existence of such a relationship shall be determined based on a consideration of the following factors: (i) The length of the relationship; (ii) The type of relationship; (iii) The frequency of interaction between the persons involved in the relationship.
Domestic violence (as defined in the VAWA amendments to the Clery Act), which includes any felony or misdemeanor crimes of violence committed by a current or former spouse or intimate partner of the victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabitating with or has cohabitated with the victim as a spouse or intimate partner, by a person similarly situated to a spouse of the victim under New York State’s (NYS) domestic or family violence laws or by any other person against an adult or youth victim who is protected from that person’s acts under the domestic or family violence laws of NYS.
Stalking (as defined in the VAWA amendments to the Clery Act), meaning engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person that would cause a reasonable person to– (A) fear for their safety or the safety of others; or (B) suffer substantial emotional distress.
- Course of conduct: Two or more acts, including, but not limited to, acts in which the stalker directly, indirectly, or through third parties, by an action, method, device, or means, follows, monitors, observes, surveils, threatens, or communicates to or about a person, or interferes with a person’s property.
- Reasonable person: A reasonable person under similar circumstances and with similar identities to the victim.
- Substantial emotional distress: Significant mental suffering or anguish that may, but does not necessarily, require medical or other professional treatment or counseling.

Note that conduct that does not meet one or more of these criteria may still be prohibited under the Sexual Harassment and Misconduct Policy or the Student Responsibility and Social Conduct.

B. Consent

For the purposes of this Title IX Grievance Policy, and in accordance with NYS Article 129- B, affirmative “consent” means a knowing, voluntary, and mutual decision among all participants to engage in sexual activity. Consent can be given by words or actions, as long as those words or actions create clear permission regarding willingness to engage in the sexual activity. Silence or lack of resistance, in and of itself, does not demonstrate consent. The definition of consent does not vary based upon a participant’s sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. a) Consent to any sexual act or prior consensual sexual activity between or with any party does not necessarily constitute consent to any other sexual act. b) Consent is required regardless of whether the person initiating the act is under the influence of drugs and/or alcohol. c) Consent may be initially given but withdrawn at any time. d) Consent cannot be given when a person is incapacitated, which occurs when an individual lacks the ability to knowingly choose to participate in sexual activity.

Incapacitation may be caused by the lack of consciousness or being asleep, being involuntarily restrained, or if an individual otherwise cannot consent. Depending on the degree of intoxication, someone who is under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicants may be incapacitated and therefore unable to consent. e) Consent cannot be given when it is the result of any coercion, intimidation, force, or threat of harm. f) When consent is withdrawn or can no longer be given, sexual activity must stop.

C. Education Program or Activity

For the purposes of this Title IX Grievance Policy, The College of Saint Rose’s “education program or activity” includes:

Any on-campus premises.
Any off-campus premises that the College has substantial control over. This includes buildings or property owned or controlled by a recognized student organization.
Activity occurring within computer and internet networks, digital platforms, and computer hardware or software owned or operated by, or used in the operations of the College’s programs and activities over which the College has substantial control.

D. Formal Complaint

For the purposes of this Title IX Grievance Policy, “formal complaint” means a document – including an electronic submission – filed by a complainant with a signature or other indication that the complainant is the person filing the formal complaint, or signed by the Title IX Coordinator, alleging sexual harassment against a respondent about conduct within the College‘s education program or activity and requesting initiation of the procedures consistent with the Title IX Grievance Policy to investigate the allegation of sexual harassment.

E. Complainant

For the purposes of this Title IX Grievance Policy, Complainant means any individual who has reported being or is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute covered sexual harassment as defined under this policy.

F. Relevant evidence and questions

“Relevant” evidence and questions refer to any questions and evidence that tends to make an allegation of sexual harassment more or less likely to be true.

“Relevant” evidence and questions do not include the following types of evidence and questions, which are deemed “irrelevant” at all stages of the Title IX Grievance Process:

Evidence and questions about the complainant’s sexual predisposition or prior sexual behavior unless:
- They are offered to prove that someone other than the respondent committed the conduct alleged by the complainant, or
- They concern specific incidents of the complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the respondent and are offered to prove consent. 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(6)(i).
Evidence and questions that constitute, or seek disclosure of, information protected under a legally recognized privilege.
- Any party’s medical, psychological, and similar records unless the party has given voluntary, written consent. 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30294 (May 19, 2020).

G. Respondent

For the purposes of this Title IX Grievance policy, Respondent means any individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute covered sexual harassment as defined under this policy.

H. Privacy vs. Confidentiality

References made to confidentiality refer to the ability of identified confidential resources to not report crimes and violations to law enforcement or college officials without permission, except for extreme circumstances, such as a health and/or safety emergency or child abuse. References made to privacy mean the College offices and employees who cannot guarantee confidentiality but will maintain privacy to the greatest extent possible, and information disclosed will be relayed only as necessary to investigate and/or seek a resolution and to notify the Title IX Coordinator or designee, who is responsible for tracking patterns and spotting systemic issues. The College will limit the disclosure as much as practicable, even if the Title IX Coordinator determines that the request for confidentiality cannot be honored.

I. Disability Accommodations

This Policy does not alter any institutional obligations under federal disability laws including the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Parties may request reasonable accommodations for disclosed disabilities to the Title IX Coordinator at any point before or during the Title IX Grievance Process that do not fundamentally alter the Process. The Title IX Coordinator will not affirmatively provide disability accommodations that have not been specifically requested by the Parties, even where the Parties may be receiving accommodations in other institutional programs and activities.

J. Student

All full-time/part-time, undergraduate, and graduate matriculated students who are enrolled in any of the College’s academic programs (in all in-person and on-line courses and related degree requirements), including all required field placements, student teaching experiences, and internships for course credit. This definition also applies to students participating in the College Experience Program.

K. Employee

Refers to individuals who hold full-time and part-time positions as faculty members, administrators, or staff members.

L. Covered Individual

Contractors, subcontractors, vendors, consultants and other persons conducting business with the College.

III. General Rules of Application:

A. Effective Date

This Title IX Grievance Policy will become effective on August 14, 2020 and will only apply to formal complaints of covered sexual harassment brought on or after August 14, 2020.

B. Revocation by Operation of Law

Should any portion of the Title IX Final Rule, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026 (May 19, 2020), be stayed or held invalid by a court of law, or should the Title IX Final Rule be withdrawn or modified to not require the elements of this policy, this policy, or the invalidated elements of this policy, will be deemed revoked as of the publication date of the opinion or order and for all reports after that date, as well as any elements of the process that occur after that date if a case is not complete by that date of opinion or order publication. Should the Title IX Grievance Policy be revoked in this manner, any conduct covered under the Title IX Grievance Policy shall be investigated and adjudicated under the existing Sexual Harassment Policy, the Sexual Misconduct Policy or the Student Community Standards, Policies and Procedures.

C. Non-Discrimination in Application

The requirements and protections of this policy apply equally regardless of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or other protected classes covered by federal or state law. All requirements and protections are equitably provided to individuals regardless of such status or status as a Complainant, Respondent, or Witness. Individuals who wish to file a complaint about the institution’s policy or process may contact the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights using contact information available at https://ocrcas.ed.gov/contact-ocr.

D. Making a Report Regarding Covered Sexual Harassment to the Institution

Any person may report sex discrimination, including sexual harassment (whether or not the person reporting is the person alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute sex discrimination or sexual harassment), in person, by mail, by telephone, or by electronic mail, using the contact information listed for the Title IX Coordinator, or by any other means that results in the Title IX Coordinator receiving the person’s verbal or written report.

Contact Information for the Title IX Coordinator:

Name: Kateeka Harris

Title: Title IX Coordinator

Email Address: titleix@strose.edu

File report online: https://www.strose.edu/student-development/policies-important-info/title-ix/reporting/

Telephone Number: 518.223.2550

Such a report may be made at any time (including during non-business hours) by using the telephone number or electronic mail address listed for the Title IX Coordinator.

E. Responsible Employees:

Responsible Employees are mandatory reporters and include all covered individuals, employees (faculty, administrators, and staff) as well as student employees such as Resident Assistants, unless exempted as outlined in the Confidential Reporting and Resources section of this Policy below.

As mandatory reporters, Responsible Employees are required to report all details of an incident of sexual harassment, sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, stalking, and any other sexual misconduct, including the identity of the victim, the identity of the alleged perpetrator (if revealed), the date and location of the incident and details regarding the incident if known, to the Title IX Coordinator for purposes of initiation of an investigation and appropriate action.

Responsible Employees are trained to provide information and support and appropriate referral to confidential or private reporting resources. Responsible Employees are also required to provide Clery Act statistical information and/or information for a Timely Warning as warranted.

Any failure to report an incident of sexual misconduct may result in disciplinary action being brought against the Responsible Employee, up to and including termination of employment.

F. Private Reporting Options

The following Officials will provide privacy, but not confidentiality, upon receiving a report of conduct prohibited under this policy:

Title IX Coordinator or designee
Other Officials with Authority (required to report known details to Title IX Coordinator):
- Jeffrey Knapp, Associate Vice President for Human Resources and Deputy Title IX Coordinator, 518-454-5138
- Jennifer Richardson, Associate Vice President for Student Development and Deputy Title IX Coordinator, 518-454-2023
- Steve Stella, Director of Safety and Security, 518-454-5187
- Craig Tynan, Registrar, 518-458-5464
- Gerald Lorentz, Dean, Division of Education and Humanities, 518-454-2800
- Ian MacDonald, Dean, Division of Science and Business, 518-454-5266
- Lori Anctil, Associate Vice President and Director of Athletics, 518-454-5282
- Yolanda Caldwell, Chief Diversity Officer, 518-485-3133
- Margaret T. McLane, Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs, 518-485-3334
Other Reporting Options on Campus:
- Campus Security, 518-454-5187
- Residence Life, 518-454-5295
- Albany Police, 518-458-5660 or 911
- Investigator, NYSP Campus Sexual Assault Victims Unit, 1-844-845-7269
- Saint Rose Anonymous Tip Line, 518-454-5275,

https://onlineforms.strose.edu/anonymous-report/submit/

The following offices may provide confidentiality:

On-Campus Confidential Reporting and Resources:
- Counseling Services, 518-454-5200
- Health Services, 518-454-5244
- Spiritual Life, 518-454-5296
Off Campus Confidential Assistance:
- The Albany County Crime Victim and Sexual Violence Center, 518-447-7716 (24-hr hotline, free counseling for students)
- Equinox, Inc., 518-432-7865 (24 hr domestic violence hotline, free services)
- In Our Own Voices, 518-432-4188
- The Legal Project, 518-435-1770
- Albany Medical Center, 518-262-3131 (sexual assault exams are free and not processed through student’s insurance)
- Albany Memorial Hospital, 518-471-3221 (sexual assault exams are free and not processed through student’s insurance)
- St. Peter’s Hospital, 518-525-1550, (sexual assault exams are free and not processed through student’s insurance)
- National Sexual Assault Hotline, 1-800-656-HOPE (4673)
- National Domestic Violence Hotline, 1-800-799-7233
- National Stalking (and all crime) Victim Helpline, 1-855-484-2846
- Crisis Text Line, Text HOME to 741741 for free, 24/7 crisis support in the U.S.

IV. Non-Investigatory Measures Available Under the Title IX Grievance Policy:

A. Supportive Measures

Complainants (as defined above), who report allegations that could constitute covered sexual harassment under this policy, have the right to receive supportive measures from the College regardless of whether they desire to file a complaint, as appropriate. Supportive measures are non-disciplinary and non-punitive.

As appropriate, supportive measures may include, but not be limited to:

Counseling
extensions of deadlines or other course-related adjustments
modifications of work or class schedules
campus escort services
restrictions on contact between the parties (no contact orders, issuing a persona non grata, and/or assistance processing an order of protection)
changes in work or housing locations
leaves of absence
increased security and monitoring of certain areas of the campus

See 85 Fed. Reg. 30401.

B. Emergency Removal

The College of Saint Rose retains the authority to remove a respondent from the College’s program or activity on an emergency basis, where the College (1) undertakes an individualized safety and risk analysis and (2) determines that an immediate threat to the physical health or safety of any student or other individual arising from the allegations of covered sexual harassment justifies a removal.

If the College determines such removal is necessary, the respondent will be provided notice and an opportunity to challenge the decision immediately following the removal. The Respondent will meet with the Title IX Coordinator or Designee and the Director of Safety and Security to be notified that an emergency removal is necessary and be provided with a formal letter. The respondent will have three (3) business days to challenge the removal determination in a letter sent to the Vice President for Student Development or designee.

C. Administrative Leave

The College retains the authority to place a non-student employee respondent on administrative leave during the Title IX Grievance Process, consistent with the Policy and Procedures for Handling Complaints of Discrimination and Harassment for Employees.

V. The Title IX Grievance Process

A. Filing a Formal Complaint

The timeframe for the Title IX Grievance Process begins with the filing of a Formal Complaint. The Grievance Process will be concluded within a reasonably prompt manner, and no longer than ninety (90) business days, which does not include days that the College is closed, after the filing of the Formal Complaint, provided that the Process may be extended for a good reason, including but not limited to the absence of a party, a party’s advisor, or a witness; concurrent law enforcement activity; or the need for language assistance or accommodation of disabilities. The procedure for applying for extensions is described below.

To file a Formal Complaint, a complainant must provide the Title IX Coordinator a written, signed complaint describing the facts alleged. Complainants are only able to file a Formal Complaint under this Policy if they are currently participating in, or attempting to participate in, the education programs or activities of the College, including as an employee. For complainants who do not meet this criteria, the College will utilize existing policy in the Community Standards, Policies, and Procedures https://www.strose.edu/title-ix/reporting/.

If a complainant does not wish to make a Formal Complaint, the Title IX Coordinator may determine a Formal Complaint is necessary. The College will inform the complainant of this decision in writing, and the complainant need not participate in the process further but will receive all notices issued under this Policy and Process.

Nothing in the Title IX Grievance Policy, the Sexual Harassment Policy, the Sexual Misconduct Policy, or the Community Standards, Policies, and Procedures prevents a complainant from seeking the assistance of state or local law enforcement alongside the appropriate on-campus process.

A complainant who files a Formal Complaint may elect, at any time, to address the matter through the Institution’s Informal Resolution Process. Information about this process is available here: https://www.strose.edu/title-ix/documentation/#informal-resolution-process.

B. Informal Resolution

A complainant who files a Formal Complaint may elect, at any time, to address the matter through the Institution’s Informal Resolution Process. All Parties to a Formal Complaint must agree to enter the Informal Resolution Process through an informed written consent. Information about this Process is available here: https://www.strose.edu/title-ix/documentation/#informal-resolution-process

C. Multi-Party Situations

The institution may consolidate Formal Complaints alleging covered sexual harassment against more than one respondent, or by more than one complainant against one or more respondents, or by one party against the other party, where the allegations of covered sexual harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances.

D. Determining Jurisdiction

The Title IX Coordinator or designee will determine if the instant Title IX Grievance Process should apply to a Formal Complaint. The Process will apply when all of the following elements are met, in the reasonable determination of the Title IX Coordinator:

The conduct is alleged to have occurred on or after August 14, 2020;
The conduct is alleged to have occurred in the United States;
The conduct is alleged to have occurred in the College’s education program or activity; and
The alleged conduct, if true, would constitute covered sexual harassment as defined in this policy.

If all of the elements are met, the College will investigate the allegations according to the Grievance Process.

E. Allegations Potentially Falling Under Two Policies

If the alleged conduct, if true, includes conduct that would constitute covered sexual harassment and conduct that would not constitute covered sexual harassment, the Title IX Grievance Process will be applied in the investigation and adjudication of all of the allegations.

F. Mandatory Dismissal

If any one of these elements are not met, the Title IX Coordinator or designee will notify the parties that the Formal Complaint is being dismissed for the purposes of the Title IX Grievance Policy. Each party may appeal this dismissal using the procedure outlined in “Appeals,” below.

G. Discretionary Dismissal

The Title IX Coordinator or designee may dismiss a Formal Complaint brought under the Title IX Grievance Policy, or any specific allegations raised within that Formal Complaint, at any time during the investigation or hearing, if:

A complainant notifies the Title IX Coordinator in writing that they would like to withdraw the Formal Complaint or any allegations raised in the Formal Complaint;
The respondent is no longer enrolled or employed by the College; or,
If specific circumstances prevent the College from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination regarding the Formal Complaint or allegations within the Formal Complaint.

Any party may appeal a dismissal determination using the process set forth in “Appeals,” below.

H. Notice of Dismissal

Upon reaching a decision that the Formal Complaint will be dismissed, the institution will promptly send written notice of the dismissal of the Formal Complaint or any specific allegation within the Formal Complaint, and the reason for the dismissal, simultaneously to the parties through their institutional email accounts or other email account upon request or in the event the complainant/respondent has left the institution. It is the responsibility of parties to maintain and regularly check their email accounts.

I. Notice of Removal

Upon dismissal for the purposes of Title IX, the College retains discretion to utilize the Sexual Harassment Policy, [https://www.strose.edu/sexual-harassment-policy/], the Sexual Misconduct Policy, [https://www.strose.edu/sexual-misconduct-policy/], or the Community Standards, Policies and Procedures, [https://www.strose.edu/student-development/policies-important-info/community-standards-safety/community-standards-policies-and-procedures/], to determine if a violation of the Sexual Harassment Policy, the Sexual Misconduct Policy or the Community Standards, Policies and Procedures has occurred. If so, the College will promptly send written notice of the dismissal of the Formal Complaint under the Title IX Grievance Process and removal of the allegations to the Sexual Harassment, the Sexual Misconduct or the Community Standards, Policies and Procedures process.

J. Notice of Allegations

The Title IX Coordinator will draft and provide the Notice of Allegations to any party to the allegations of sexual harassment. Such notice will occur as soon as practicable, after the institution receives a Formal Complaint of the allegations, if there are no extenuating circumstances.

The parties will be notified by their institutional email accounts if they are a student or employee, and by other reasonable means if they are neither.

The institution will provide sufficient time for the parties to review the Notice of Allegations and prepare a response before any initial interview.

The Title IX Coordinator or designee may determine that the Formal Complaint must be dismissed on the mandatory grounds identified above and will issue a Notice of Dismissal. If such a determination is made, any party to the allegations of sexual harassment identified in the Formal Complaint will receive the Notice of Dismissal in conjunction with, or in separate correspondence after, the Notice of Allegations.

K. Contents of Notice

The Notice of Allegations will include the following:

Notice of the institution’s Title IX Grievance Process including any informal resolution process and a hyperlink to a copy of the process.
Notice of the allegations potentially constituting covered sexual harassment, and sufficient details known at the time the Notice is issued, such as the identities of the parties involved in the incident, if known, including the complainant; the conduct allegedly constituting covered sexual harassment; and the date and location of the alleged incident, if known.
A statement that the respondent is presumed not responsible for the alleged conduct and that a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the grievance process.
A statement that the parties may have an advisor of their choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, as required under 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(5)(iv);
A statement that before the conclusion of the investigation, the parties may inspect and review evidence obtained as part of the investigation that is directly related to the allegations raised in the Formal Complaint, including the evidence upon which the institution does not intend to rely in reaching a determination regarding responsibility, and evidence that both tends to prove or disprove the allegations, whether obtained from a party or other source, as required under 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(5)(vi);
A statement that, according to the Student Responsibility and Social Conduct under Furnishing False Information prohibits knowingly making false statements or knowingly submitting false information during the grievance process.

L. Ongoing Notice

If, in the course of an investigation, the institution decides to investigate allegations about the complainant or respondent that are not included in the Notice of Allegations and are otherwise covered “sexual harassment” falling within the Title IX Grievance Policy, the institution will notify the parties whose identities are known of the additional allegations by their institutional email accounts or other reasonable means.

The parties will be provided sufficient time to review the additional allegations to prepare a response before any initial interview regarding those additional charges.

M. Advisor of Choice and Participation of Advisor of Choice

The College of Saint Rose will provide the parties equal access to advisors and support persons; any restrictions on advisor participation will be applied equally.

The College has a long-standing practice of requiring students to participate in the process directly and not through an advocate or representative. Students participating as Complainant or Respondent in this process may be accompanied by an Advisor of Choice to any meeting or hearing to which they are required or are eligible to attend. The Advisor of Choice is not an advocate. Except where explicitly stated by this Policy, as consistent with the Final Rule, Advisors of Choice shall not participate directly in the process as per standard policy and practice of the College.

The College will not intentionally schedule meetings or hearings on dates where the Advisors of Choice for all parties are not available, provided that the Advisors act reasonably in providing available dates and work collegially to find dates and times that meet all schedules.

The College’s obligations to investigate and adjudicate in a prompt timeframe under Title IX and other college policies apply to matters governed under this Policy, and the College cannot agree to extensive delays solely to accommodate the schedule of an Advisor of Choice. The determination of what is reasonable shall be made by the Title IX Coordinator or designee. The College will not be obligated to delay a meeting or hearing under this process more than five (5) days due to the unavailability of an Advisor of Choice and may offer the party the opportunity to obtain a different Advisor of Choice or utilize one provided by the College.

N. Notice of Meetings and Interviews

The College will provide, to a party whose participation is invited or expected, written notice of the date, time, location, participants, and purpose of all hearings, investigative interviews, or other meetings with a party, with sufficient time for the party to prepare to participate.

O. Delays

Each party may request a one-time delay in the Grievance Process of up to five (5) days for good cause (granted or denied in the sole judgment of the Title IX Coordinator, or designee) provided that the requestor provides reasonable notice and the delay does not overly inconvenience other parties.

For example, a request to take a five-day pause made an hour before a hearing for which multiple parties and their advisors have traveled to and prepared for shall generally not be granted, while a request for a five-day pause in the middle of investigation interviews to allow a party to obtain certain documentary evidence shall generally be granted.

The Title IX Coordinator or designee shall have sole judgment to grant further pauses in the Process.

VI. General Rules of Investigations

Investigators designated by the Title IX Coordinator will perform an investigation under a reasonably prompt timeframe of the conduct alleged to constitute covered sexual harassment after issuing the Notice of Allegations.

The College and not the parties, has the burden of proof and the burden of gathering evidence, i.e. the responsibility of showing a violation of this Policy has occurred. This burden does not rest with either party, and either party may decide not to share their account of what occurred or may decide not to participate in an investigation or hearing. This does not shift the burden of proof away from the College and does not indicate responsibility.

The College cannot access, consider, or disclose medical records without a waiver from the party (or parent, if applicable) to whom the records belong or of whom the records include information. The College will provide an equal opportunity for the parties to present witnesses, including fact and expert witnesses, and other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence, (i.e. evidence that tends to prove and disprove the allegations) as described below.

A. Inspection and Review of Evidence

Prior to the completion of the investigation, the parties will have an equal opportunity to inspect and review the evidence obtained through the investigation. The purpose of the inspection and review process is to allow each party the equal opportunity to meaningfully respond to the evidence prior to conclusion of the investigation.

Evidence that will be available for inspection and review by the parties will be any evidence that is directly related to the allegations raised in the Formal Complaint. It will include any:

Evidence that is relevant, even if that evidence does not end up being relied upon by the institution in making a determination regarding responsibility;
Inculpatory or exculpatory evidence (i.e. evidence that tends to prove or disprove the allegations) that is directly related to the allegations, whether obtained from a party or other source.

All parties must submit any evidence they would like the investigator to consider prior to when the parties’ time to inspect and review evidence begins. See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30307 (May 19, 2020).

The institution will send the evidence made available for each party and each party’s advisor, if any, to inspect and review through an electronic format or a hard copy. The Institution is not under an obligation to use any specific process or technology to provide the evidence and shall have the sole discretion in terms of determining format and any restrictions or limitations on access.

The parties will have ten (10) business days to inspect and review the evidence and submit a written response by email to the investigator. The investigator will consider the parties’ written responses before completing the Investigative Report.

The institution will provide copies of the parties’ written responses to the investigator to all parties and their advisors, if any. See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30307 (May 19, 2020).

Any evidence subject to inspection and review will be available at any hearing, including for purposes of cross-examination.

The parties and their advisors must sign an agreement not to photograph or otherwise copy the evidence, disseminate any of the evidence subject to inspection and review or use such evidence for any purpose unrelated to the Title IX grievance process. See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30435 (May 19, 2020).

B. Inclusion of Evidence Not Directly Related to the Allegations

Evidence obtained in the investigation that is determined in the reasoned judgment of the investigator not to be directly related to the allegations in the Formal Complaint will not be disclosed, or may be appropriately redacted before the parties’ inspection to avoid disclosure of personally identifiable information of a student. Any evidence obtained in the investigation that is kept from disclosure or appropriately redacted will be documented in a “privilege log” that may be reviewed by the parties and their advisors, if any. See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30438 (May 19, 2020).

C. Investigative Report

The Investigators designated by the Title IX Coordinator will create an Investigative Report that fairly summarizes relevant evidence, and provide that Report to the parties at least ten (10) business days prior to the hearing (in electronic format or hard copy) for each party’s review and written response.

The Investigative Report is not intended to catalog all evidence obtained by the investigator, but only to provide a fair summary of that evidence.

Only relevant evidence (including both inculpatory and exculpatory – i.e. tending to prove and disprove the allegations – relevant evidence) will be referenced in the Investigative Report. The investigator(s) or the Title IX Coordinator may redact irrelevant information from the Investigative Report when that information is contained in documents or evidence that is/are otherwise relevant, however a hard copy of the original unredacted Investigative Report will be maintained in the College’s secure files. See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30304 (May 19, 2020).

VII. Hearing

A. General Rules of Hearings

The College will not issue a disciplinary sanction arising from an allegation of covered sexual harassment without holding a live hearing unless otherwise resolved through an informal resolution process.

The live hearing may be conducted with all parties physically present in the same geographic location, or, at the College’s discretion, any or all parties, witnesses, and other participants may appear at the live hearing virtually through a private, password-protected video conference platform account with waiting rooms for all parties to be in until they are needed for the hearing. This technology will enable participants simultaneously to see and hear each other. At its discretion, the College may delay or adjourn a hearing based on technological errors not within a party’s control.

All proceedings will be recorded through audio recording. That recording or transcript will be made available to the parties for inspection and review.

Prior to obtaining access to any evidence, the parties and their advisors must sign an agreement not to disseminate any of the testimony heard or evidence obtained in the hearing or use such testimony or evidence for any purpose unrelated to the Title IX Grievance Process. Once signed, this Agreement may not be withdrawn See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30435 (May 19, 2020).

B. Continuances or Granting Extensions

The College may determine that multiple sessions or a continuance (i.e. a pause on the continuation of the hearing until a later date or time) is needed to complete a hearing. If so, the College will notify all participants and endeavor to accommodate all participants’ schedules and complete the hearing as promptly as practicable.

C. Newly-discovered Evidence

As a general rule, no new evidence or witnesses may be submitted during the live hearing.

If a party identifies new evidence or witnesses that were not reasonably available prior to the live hearing and could affect the outcome of the matter, the party may request that such evidence or witnesses be considered at the live hearing.

The Administrative Hearing Chair will consider this request and make a determination regarding (1) whether such evidence or witness testimony was actually unavailable by reasonable effort prior to the hearing, and (2) whether such evidence or witness testimony could affect the outcome of the matter. The party offering the newly-discovered evidence or witness has the burden of establishing these questions by the preponderance of the evidence.

If the Administrative Hearing Chair answers in the affirmative to both questions, then the parties will be granted a reasonable pause in the hearing to review the evidence or prepare for questioning of the witness.

D. Participants in the live hearing

Live hearings are not public, and the only individuals permitted to participate in the hearing are as follows:

Complainant and Respondent (The Parties)

The parties cannot waive the right to a live hearing.
The institution may still proceed with the live hearing in the absence of a party and may reach a determination of responsibility in their absence.
The College will not threaten, coerce, intimidate or discriminate against the party in an attempt to secure the party’s participation. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.71; see also 85 Fed. 30026, 30216 (May 19, 2020).
The decision-maker cannot draw an inference about the determination regarding responsibility based solely on a party’s absence from the live hearing or refusal to answer cross examination or other questions. See 34 C.F.R. § 106.45(b)(6)(i).
The parties shall be subject to the institution’s Rules of Decorum,

https://www.strose.edu/title-ix/documentation/#rules-of-decorum-policy

The Decision-maker

The hearing body will consist of a panel of three (3) decision-makers.
No member of the hearing body will also have served as the Title IX Coordinator, Title IX investigator, or advisor to any party in the case, nor may any member of the hearing body serve on the appeals body in the case.
No member of the hearing body will have a conflict of interest or bias in favor of or against complainants or respondents generally, or in favor or against the parties to the particular case.
The hearing body will be trained on topics including how to serve impartially, issues of relevance, including how to apply the rape shield protections provided for complainants, and any technology to be used at the hearing.
The parties will have an opportunity to raise any objections regarding a decision-maker’s actual or perceived conflicts of interest or bias at the commencement of the live hearing.

Advisor of choice

The parties have the right to select an advisor of their choice, who may be, but does not have to be, an attorney.
The advisor of choice may accompany the parties to any meeting or hearing they are permitted to attend, but may not speak for the party, except for the purpose of cross- examination.
The parties are not permitted to conduct cross-examination; it must be conducted by the advisor. As a result, if a party does not select an advisor, the institution will select an advisor to serve in this role for the limited purpose of conducting the cross-examination at no fee or charge to the party.
The advisor is not prohibited from having a conflict of interest or bias in favor of or against complainants or respondents generally, or in favor or against the parties to the particular case.
The advisor is not prohibited from being a witness in the matter.
If a party does not attend the live hearing, the party’s advisor may appear and conduct cross-examination on their behalf. 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30340 (May 19, 2020).
If neither a party nor their advisor appear at the hearing, the College will provide an advisor to appear on behalf of the non-appearing party. See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30339- 40 (May 19, 2020).
Advisors shall be subject to the institution’s Rules of Decorum and may be removed upon violation of those Rules, https://www.strose.edu/title-ix/documentation/#rules-of- decorum-policy.

Witnesses

Witnesses cannot be compelled to participate in the live hearing and have the right not to participate in the hearing free from retaliation. See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30360 (May 19, 2020).
Witnesses shall be subject to the institution’s Rules of Decorum

https://www.strose.edu/title-ix/documentation/#rules-of-decorum-policy.

E. Hearing Procedures

For all live hearings conducted under this Title IX Grievance Process, the procedure will be as follows:

At least one (1) business day prior to the scheduled hearing, the hearing body will hold a prehearing conference with the advisors for the parties. At the prehearing conference, the hearing body will set the rules of decorum for the hearing and discuss rules of relevance that will apply during the hearing;
When the hearing opens, the Administrative Hearing Chair will restate the rules and expectations for the hearing that were discussed at the prehearing conference;
The Parties will each be given the opportunity to provide opening statements;
Administrative Hearing Chair or other panel members will ask questions of the Parties and Witnesses;
Parties will be given the opportunity for live cross-examination after Administrative Hearing Chair or other panel members conducts its initial round of questioning; During the Parties’ cross-examination, Administrative Hearing Chair or other panel members will have the authority to pause cross-examination at any time for the purposes of asking Administrative Hearing Chair or other panel members’ own follow up questions; and any time necessary in order to enforce the established rules of decorum. https://www.strose.edu/title-ix/documentation/#rules-of-decorum-policy.
Should a Party or the Party’s Advisor choose not to cross-examine a Party or Witness, the Party shall affirmatively waive cross-examination through a written or oral statement to the Administrative Hearing Chair or other panel members. A Party’s waiver of cross-examination does not eliminate the ability of the Administrative Hearing Chair or other panel members to use statements made by the Party.

F. Live Cross-Examination Procedure

Each party’s advisor will conduct live cross-examination of the other party or parties and witnesses. During this live-cross examination the advisor will ask the other party or parties and witnesses relevant questions and follow-up questions, including those challenging credibility directly, orally, and in real time.

Before any cross-examination question is answered, Administrative Hearing Chair or other panel members will determine if the question is relevant. Cross-examination questions that are duplicative of those already asked, including by the Administrative Hearing Chair or other panel members may be deemed irrelevant if they have been asked and answered.

G. Review of Recording

The recording of the hearing will be available for review by the parties within five (5) business days, unless there are any extenuating circumstances. The recording of the hearing will not be provided to parties or advisors of choice.

VIII. Determination Regarding Responsibility

A. Standard of Proof

The College uses the preponderance of the evidence standard for investigations and determinations regarding responsibility of formal complaints covered under this Policy. This means that the investigation and hearing determines whether it is more likely than not that a violation of the Policy occurred.

B. General Considerations for Evaluating Testimony and Evidence

While the opportunity for cross-examination is required in all Title IX hearings, determinations regarding responsibility may be based in part, or entirely, on documentary, audiovisual, and digital evidence, as warranted in the reasoned judgment of the Decision-maker.

Decision-makers shall not draw inferences regarding a party or witness’ credibility based on the party or witness’ status as a complainant, respondent, or witness, nor shall it base its judgments in stereotypes about how a party or witness would or should act under the circumstances.

Generally, credibility judgments should rest on the demeanor of the party or witness, the plausibility of their testimony, the consistency of their testimony, and its reliability in light of corroborating or conflicting testimony or evidence.

Still, credibility judgments should not rest on whether a party or witness’ testimony is non-linear or incomplete, or if the party or witness is displaying stress or anxiety.

Decision makers will afford the highest weight relative to other testimony to first-hand testimony by parties and witnesses regarding their own memory of specific facts that occurred. Both inculpatory and exculpatory (i.e. tending to prove and disprove the allegations) evidence will be weighed in equal fashion.

Except where specifically barred by the Title IX Final Rule, a witness’ testimony regarding third-party knowledge of the facts at issue will be allowed but will generally be accorded lower weight than testimony regarding direct knowledge of specific facts that occurred.

The Final Rule requires that the College allow parties to call “expert witnesses” for direct and cross examination. The College does not provide for expert witnesses in other proceedings. While the expert witness will be allowed to testify and be crossed as required by the Final Rule, the decision-maker will be instructed to afford lower weight to non-factual testimony of the expert relative to fact witnesses, and any expert testimony that is not directed to the specific facts that occurred in the case will be afforded lower weight relative to fact witnesses, regardless of whether the expert witness testimony is the subject of cross examination and regardless of whether all parties present experts as witnesses.

The Final Rule requires that the College allow parties to call character witnesses to testify. The College does not provide for character witnesses in other proceedings. While the character witnesses will be allowed to testify and be crossed as required by the Final Rule, the decision- maker will be instructed to afford very low weight to any non-factual character testimony of any witness.

The Final Rule requires that the College admit and allow testimony regarding polygraph tests (“lie detector tests”) and other procedures that are outside of standard use in academic and non- academic conduct processes. While the processes and testimony about them will be allowed to testify and be crossed as required by the Final Rule, the decision-maker will be instructed to afford lower weight to such processes relative to the testimony of fact witnesses.

Where a party or witness’ conduct or statements demonstrate that the party or witness is engaging in retaliatory conduct, including but not limited to witness tampering and intimidation, the Administrative Hearing Chair may draw an adverse inference as to that party or witness’ credibility.

C. Components of the Determination Regarding Responsibility

The written Determination Regarding Responsibility will be issued simultaneously to all parties through their institution email account, or other reasonable means as necessary. The Determination will include:

Identification of the allegations potentially constituting covered sexual harassment;
A description of the procedural steps taken from the receipt of the formal complaint through the determination, including any notifications to the parties, interviews with parties and witnesses, site visits, methods used to gather other evidence, and hearings held;
Findings of fact supporting the determination;
Conclusions regarding which section of the Student Responsibility and Social Conduct, if any, the respondent has or has not violated;
For each allegation:
- A statement of, and rationale for, a determination regarding responsibility;
- A statement of, and rationale for, any disciplinary sanctions the recipient imposes on the respondent; and
- A statement of, and rationale for, whether remedies designed to restore or preserve equal access to the recipient’s education program or activity will be provided by the recipient to the complainant; and
- The recipient’s procedures and the permitted reasons for the complainant and respondent to appeal (described below in “Appeal”).

D. Timeline of Determination Regarding Responsibility

If there are no extenuating circumstances, the determination regarding responsibility will be issued by the College within ten (10) business days of the completion of the hearing.

E. Sanctions Possible for Students Under the Title IX Grievance Process:

Censure
Anger Management Program
Behavioral Contract
Conflict Management Training
Educational Service Hours/Training/Programming
Reflective Exercises
Removal from College Housing
Interim Suspension
Restrictions
Restitution
Persona Non Grata
No Contact Order
Disciplinary Probation
Disciplinary Suspension
Disciplinary Dismissal
Transcript Notation
Work, class or housing modifications (including, but not limited to, changing work study jobs/hours, changing class sections or delivery mode of classes, and changing building/room assignments)

F. Sanctions Possible for Employees and Covered Individuals Under the Title IX Grievance Process:

written warning,
termination,
informal counsel,
formal counsel,
restriction of access and
suspension without pay.

G. Finality

The determination regarding responsibility becomes final either on the date that the institution provides the parties with the written determination of the result of the appeal, if an appeal is filed consistent with the procedures and timeline outlined in “Appeals” below, or if an appeal is not filed, the date on which the opportunity to appeal expires.

If the outcome of a final decision is termination of employment for an employee-respondent, the College will follow the procedures outlined in any applicable vendor contract, employee handbook or union contract.

IX. Appeals

Each party may appeal (1) the dismissal of a formal complaint or any included allegations and/or (2) a determination regarding responsibility. To appeal, a party must submit their written appeal within three (3) business days of being notified of the decision, indicating the grounds for the appeal.

The limited grounds for appeal available are as follows:

Procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of the matter (i.e. a failure to follow the institution’s own procedures);
New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination regarding responsibility or dismissal was made, that could affect the outcome of the matter;
The Title IX Coordinator, investigator(s), or decision-maker(s) had a conflict of interest or bias for or against an individual party, or for or against complainants or respondents in general, that affected the outcome of the matter;
The sanction is disproportionate, or otherwise inappropriate to the proven violation.

The submission of appeal stays any sanctions for the pendency of an appeal. Supportive measures and remote learning opportunities remain available during the pendency of the appeal.

If a party appeals, the institution will as soon as practicable notify the other party in writing of the appeal, however the time for appeal shall be offered equitably to all parties and shall not be extended for any party solely because the other party filed an appeal.

Appeals may be no longer than five (5) pages (including attachments). Appeals should be submitted in electronic form using ARIAL or TIMES NEW ROMAN, 12 point font, and single- spaced. Appeals should use footnotes, not endnotes. Appeals that do not meet these standards may be returned to the party for correction, but the time for appeal will not be extended unless there is evidence that technical malfunction caused the appeal document not to meet these standards.

Appeals shall be submitted via e-mail or in person to the Title IX Coordinator (titleix@strose.edu). Appeals will be decided by an Appeal Hearing Board comprised of three (3) individuals, to handle and issue a written decision regarding the appeal. The Appeal Hearing Board will be free of conflict of interest and bias, and will not serve as investigator, Title IX Coordinator, or hearing decision-maker in the same matter. Prior to the Appeal Hearing Board receiving the appeal information, the parties will be notified who will serve on the Appeal Hearing Board and will have three (3) business days to provide in writing why they believe a member(s) of the board are not free of conflict of interest and bias.

The outcome of appeal will be provided in writing simultaneously to both parties and include rationale for the decision within ten (10) business days of the last date for the appeal. The Appeal Hearing Board shall determine whether to (1) remand the matter to the investigator for further investigation, (2) uphold the investigator’s finding and/or sanction, (3) overturn the investigator’s finding and/or sanction, and/or (4) modify the investigator’s finding and/or sanction.

X. Retaliation

The College will keep the identity of any individual who has made a report or complaint of sex discrimination confidential, including the identity of any individual who has made a report or filed a Formal Complaint of sexual harassment under this Title IX Grievance Policy, any Complainant, any individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of sex discrimination, any Respondent, and any witness, except as permitted by the FERPA statute, 20 U.S.C. 1232g, or FERPA regulations, 34 CFR part 99, or as required by law, or to carry out the purposes of 34 CFR part 106, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding under this Title IX Grievance Policy.

No person may intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 or its implementing regulations.

No person may intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual because the individual has made a report or complaint, testified, assisted, or participated or refused to participate in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under this Title IX Grievance Policy.

Any intimidation, threats, coercion, or discrimination, for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by Title IX or its implementing regulations constitutes retaliation. This includes any charges filed against an individual for code of conduct violations that do not involve sex discrimination or sexual harassment, but that arise from the same facts or circumstances as a report or complaint of sex discrimination or a report or Formal Complaint of sexual harassment. Refer to the Amnesty Statement in the Community Standards, Policies and Procedures section of the Student Handbook.

Complaints alleging retaliation may be filed according to the Bias, Discrimination, Harassment, Retaliation, and Hate Crimes Complaint/Grievance Policy & Procedure for Students and Employees [https://www.strose.edu/student-development/diversity-inclusion/hate-crime-report/].